Infants’ Department, June 1918 The first time I encountered these words, paging through a heavy, bound issue of Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department, nearly thirty years ago, I stopped and re-read it several times, at least once under my breath. I was following up a minor sideline in a project on babies’ clothing during the Progressive Era -- the seemingly trivial question “when were pink and blue introduced as gendered colors?” At that point, the white rabbit darted into its hole and I dove in after it. Years later, I am back to tell the very complicated tale of how American baby and toddler clothing went from completely devoid of sexual hints to almost completely separated into “his” and hers” camps.
"Pink or Blue? Which is intended for boys and which for girls? This question comes from one of our readers this month, and the discussion may be of interest to others. There has been a great diversity of opinion on this subject, but the generally accepted rule is pink for the poy and blue for the girls. the reason is that pink being a more decided and stringer color, is more suitable for the boy' while blue, which is more delicate and dainty is prettier for the girl” Infants’ Department, June 1918 The first time I encountered these words, paging through a heavy, bound issue of Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department, nearly thirty years ago, I stopped and re-read it several times, at least once under my breath. I was following up a minor sideline in a project on babies’ clothing during the Progressive Era -- the seemingly trivial question “when were pink and blue introduced as gendered colors?” At that point, the white rabbit darted into its hole and I dove in after it. Years later, I am back to tell the very complicated tale of how American baby and toddler clothing went from completely devoid of sexual hints to almost completely separated into “his” and hers” camps. boy's button-on suit, 1920s Pink and blue symbolism is so firmly embedded in American popular culture that it’s hard to believe that their gender associations are relatively new, and have changed with each generation. Before 1900, babies in the United States wore white clothing that signified their age but not their sex, consistent with cultural norms. Toddler clothing (up to age 4) was more colorful, but hues were assigned according to complexion, season or fashion, not sex.In the 1920s and 1930s pink was the preferred color for little boys in many parts of the United States.
Pam
7/7/2010 04:14:05 am
I love this blog...after all of the posts I wondered what exactly you were writing about this! I will continue to read as you post...it's really quite interesting!
FeministJerk
8/8/2010 02:50:15 am
In your research, was this shift from gender neutral colors to blue and pink a movement to develop more masculine boys for future wars? It seems in the 1800’s / 1900’s in many photos young boys were dressed in feminine attire. What would be the reason for this, ease in changing diapers? Some of the attire was ultra feminine and I don’t understand why mothers dressed their sons as this or why their fathers would allow it. It was a different cultural mindset from today.
Sally Ellis
4/25/2016 10:46:54 pm
Hi, I am a librarian, helping a student do a research paper and wondered if you could tell me where you accessed the 1918 issue of Earnshaw's? Is it digitized anywhere that you know of?
Jo
4/26/2016 11:14:06 am
I found it at the Library or Congress, and the image is a scan of a photocopy I did back in the 1980s when I was first doing this research -- very old school! By now it may be digitized, but I have not checked!
Jo
4/26/2016 11:16:26 am
The image of the photocopy is in the Gallery section of this site!
Sally Ellis
4/26/2016 01:59:31 pm
excellent! Thank you! Comments are closed.
|
Jo PaolettiProfessor Emerita Archives
January 2023
Categories
All
|