Follow me!
Gender Mystique

Draft conclusion

8/17/2010

 
This is the first draft (and therefore ROUGH!!) if the last paragraph of my concluding chapter. Comments and suggestions most welcome.

The story of gendered clothing for our youngest children is still unfolding, and will probably never be finished. Each generation learns a new set of rules, devised by the grown children of the previous generation. Each wave of parents dresses their sons and daughters in ways that represent their own memories and their present lives as men and women. Babies grow up, not in the parents’ cultures, but in their own, changing it by their very presence. Someday babies may be raised more as “persons” and less as  “boys” and “girls” but that has not been our trajectory for more than one hundred years. In the meantime, if anyone wants to observe the most obvious, seemingly immutable gendered aspects of our culture, visit a class of four-year-olds. Existing in the time between awareness of their sex and security in its expression, they enact every rule they observe with uncanny precision. By the time they reach their teens, they will be twisting and stretching the rules that vex them the most. Then they will become adults (and parents) and the dance goes on.

It's nature! It's nurture! It's nature! It's nurture!

8/15/2010

 
By way of apology for my lack of posts while I finish my manuscript (August 30 deadline whooshing towards me!), I offer the latest salvo in the Nature vs. Nurture battle.
(Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics (Guardian, UK, 8/15/2010)

Child consumers and gendered clothing

8/15/2010

 
I just got a great email from commenter Andi, AKA "Feministjerk" (no, he really isn't!). He offered an expansion of his theory that the connection between pink and femininity is the result of post-World War II capitalism and branding. I think he's partially right, but one of the arguments I make in the book is that children themselves are actors in the process, and any theory that does not take children into consideration as consumers is going to be incomplete. The more adults have listened to -- and marketed to-- children, the more clothing for children under the age of six has become gendered. The typical 4-year-old is about the most ardent believer in gender stereotypes you can find, because that is where they are developmentally. Thus the princess craziness, for example. Disney knows 3-6 year-old girls.

As infants grow into toddlers, they become active participants in the gender binary fashion show, much to the amusement, chagrin or dismay of their parents. For boys and girls whose gender identity generally conforms to their biological sex, this participation appears likely to be enthusiastic embrace. These are the girls who insist on wearing nothing but pink and prefer dresses to any form of pants, and the boys who clamor for buzz-cuts and ubiquitous sports imagery. One of the most puzzling questions raised by the gendered clothing of the last generation is, “What about the others?” What about tomboys, the little girls who for decades could wear plain girls’ styles or their brother’s hand-me-downs without appearing out of the mainstream? (In a study of college age women in the early 1970s, 78% described themselves as “tomboys” as children, though the age to which they referred was unclear.) What about the one person in 100 classified as “intersex”, whose body differs from standard male or female and whose sense of identity may not conform to the gender chosen for them by their parents? What about boys who, like tomboys, feel more comfortable in the clothing of the other sex, but for whom the English language has no positive term? Certainly, one of the outcomes of a strong gender binary in children’s clothing is the lack of expressive options for children whose identities may be more fluid or contrary to stereotyped images of masculinity and femininity.

Not Finding Out? There's a registry for that!

8/10/2010

 
According to recent research, 41% of expectant parents are choosing not to find out the sex of their baby before it's born. Many of those who do would prefer to have it both ways: keep the surprise but also get gender-specific gifts for their offspring. A Texas entrepreneur has solved the problem with an online gift registry that caters to these "NFO" parents. This video explains how it works.

I am finding in my research that planning and purchasing is one of the top reasons for finding out the baby's sex in advance. Of course, the question remains: why does having the right pink or blue wardrobe matter so much, at 20 weeks or 40?

Gender sonograms and the element of surprise

8/1/2010

 
Over the last 25 years, baby clothes have become increasingly gendered, and neutral options have nearly vanished. Certainly one reason is the technology that allows us to know a baby's sex with nearly 100% certainty long before birth. As a costume historian, my interest is not only in what people choose to do with that information, but how they react to the choice itself. I am hearing from more and more expectant parents who choose NOT to know; not surprisingly, these are also the folks who are the most vocal about the lack of neutral styles and about stereotypical gender binary design. They not only want to wait until birth to know if they are having a son or a daughter, but even then they want to avoid pink, girly things and "little man" outfits.

At the other extreme are parents who embrace early sex identification, because it makes preparations (not only clothing, but nursery designs and naming)  more convenient, or because they feel it helps them connect with the baby as a "real" person. For these folks, there is an industry eager to provide the information they crave. I was tipped off to the existence of First Glimpse by references and recommendations in several pregnancy blogs. This is more than the sonograms once used primarily to detect potential problems, which could sometimes also detect genetalia. What was incidental is now central, in First Glimpse's "Gender Determination" packages. Combining elements of medicine, spa treatments, scrapbooking and glamor photography, they offer women a pregnancy experience that is as commodified as a cruise. Maybe that's next.

    Jo Paoletti

    Professor Emerita
    ​American Studies
    University of Maryland

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    January 2023
    February 2022
    May 2021
    June 2020
    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010

    Categories

    All
    1920s
    1950s
    1960s
    1970s
    1980s
    Aging
    Ask Jo
    Baby Cards
    Baby Clothes
    Baby Dresses
    Beyond The Us
    Book 1
    Book 2
    Book 3
    Boys
    Button On Suit
    Button-on Suit
    Child Consumers
    Children And Consumers
    Children As Consumers
    Color Symbolism
    Creepers
    Culture Wars
    Design Details
    Dress Codes
    Dress Up Play
    Dress-up Play
    Ethnicity
    Fashion And Age
    Feminism
    Garment Details
    Gender Binary
    Girls
    Hair
    Layettes
    Men
    Middle Childhood
    Neutral
    Pants For Girls
    Pink
    Pink For Boys
    Prenatal Testing
    Princesses
    Que Sera Sera
    Rants
    Research
    Rompers
    Sexuality
    Stereotypes
    Teens
    Toddlers
    Tomboys
    Transgender
    Unisex
    Unisex. 1970s
    Women
    Writing Updates

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.